Research Findings

Navigate the key themes and findings of the AI in the Street Observatories.

AI in the Street started with the simple question: what does responsible AI look like from the street? 

Through participatory research in 5 cities across the UK and Australia, we explored different ways AI systems impact everyday moments of life in the street. Whilst there are many interpretations of "the street", and different implications for measuring innovation and "publics", the observatories specifically explored publicly owned sites. Using a mix of research-based interventions, from diagramming workshops to sensing walks and access data walks, the observatories explored the presence, roles, and effects of AI-based technologies in the street. 

The street is a site of public life — a site where many "publics" converge with different, and often competing, uses and needs. The implementation of AI in the street is often aimed at aiding mobility through space — mobility of people, traffic, goods, money. To this end, the collection of data increasingly becomes required to enable this movement through the street. AI systems simultaneously come to dominate the functioning of the street from behind the scenes, even as on the surface the systems are invisible, and almost irrelevant to how the street is experienced by different publics.

Collectively, the 5 observatories offer insights to how AI innovation manifests as messy social realities and how people's lived experiences can inform the governance of AI in cities:

  1. In the streets, AI is present through proxies. AI systems in the street depend on proxies, such as cars, cameras, drones, or other entities, to function. A high level of technical knowledge is often needed to fully understand how these systems come together to make AI work.

  2. In the streets, AI is doubly invisible: AI tends to function in ways that are difficult to make transparent and they are often designed to be invisible. They often operate beyond the lines of human sight, listening, or observation.

  3. AI is trialled in some streets rather than others. Some areas have become known as "testbeds" or "sandboxes" because they are regularly used as sites to trial new technologies. Existing social, environmental, and infrastructural realities, influence decisions about where to test AI. 

  4. In the streets, AI amplifies existing infrastructure and reinforces existing power relations. Innovation is said to be about change, but through AI systems the status quo often becomes further embedded and more difficult to change. In many streets, AI systems are layered on top of existing infrastructure, simultaneously exacerbating and making invisible existing challenges. Through this process, the intensity of technological functioning and operations begin to over-dominate as the street becomes occupied by the tech systems.

  5. In the streets, meaningful purposes for AI can be discovered. There are many existing problems that AI in the street can be seen to alleviate. What innovation enables livable, thriving cities?

AI systems interact with the street as overlapping and interlocking layers:

  1. the actual street becomes a background layer;

  2. entities such as people, non-human living beings, vehicles, and proxies exist as a separate layer on top of the street; and

  3. the relationships within and between these different entities represent a third layer, interacting in ways that make the AI systems visible or invisible.

We present an exploration of the different layers that make up AI systems as a way to explore the insights that can be gleaned from the messy realities of AI in the street. The layers offer ways to think through the different types of streets AI is implemented, the narratives that are used to justify the roll out of the systems, the common features found in the systems, the outcomes that result from the systems, and future pathways for innovation.

Location Type

What type of street is it?

Narratives

What goal is the AI system said to achieve?

AI Features

What are the features of the AI system?

Pathways

What is needed moving forward?

Research Findings in Depth: The Observatories

  • A collage of a polaroid photo of a busy city street

    Cambridge, UK

    What data do disabled people need to move through the street, and how does urban infrastructure interact with the lived experience of access needs?

  • Street Camera

    Coventry, UK

    How does the AI infrastructure needed for autonomous vehicle trials impact other human and more-than-human users of the street - and how might we see and hear the effects?

  • A collage of photos of a black box raised up above a pavement.

    Edinburgh, UK

    Engaging with residents and users of Leith Walk, seeking to capture everyday encounters with AI and understand people’s views of AI’s impact on the street.

  • A Collage of Maz, a greengrocer from Logan, talking about drone delivery. He is on a yellow map of Logan, and overlaid with a mesh of drone icons.

    Logan, AUS

    Logan is one of the world’s largest drone delivery trial sites. But what do locals feel about the presence of commercial and autonomous drone delivery systems in their neighbourhood?

  • Polaroid Image of a Cluttered Street

    London, UK

    How does AI fulfil expectations, desires and requirements in the street, and what complications does it create? Might innovation emerge from community-driven (rather than industry-led) design?

“Because of GPT, AI has become closer to the street. More people have an idea of it now. How to translate this familiarity into an awareness of societal benefits of AI?”

– Calum McDonald, Scottish AI Alliance, AI in the Street project partner